To start...a 2011 tC is a 2nd gen. So you're talking 2005-2010.

As for "performance mods" like:
pulleys
intake
exhaust
header
midpipe
chips
etc
etc
etc

Won't net you any noticeable horsepower. COMIBINED you're looking at like 7-10 (and a very loud, hideous-sounding car). And that's not anything that you're going to notice or that is going to matter.

Simply put, if you want the tC to be a "fast car" you'll have to go forced induction like S/C or Turbo.

 

That's not true. Full exhaust you will notice a gain. I particularly noticed gains in the mid-range after a full exhaust on the tC. There are no "chips" for the tC, so you can take that off the list. And you forgot to add things like:

Motor Mounts
Sway Bars
Suspension Bushings
Coilovers

An I/H/E tC can run into the 14sec 1/4 mile range. And when you get into non-power mods like motor mounts and sway bars, then that's where you can see big gains in the handling department.

The S/C is worthless, I'd rather have an I/H/E tC with great suspension.

 

Short of running the engine straight out of the header, an exhaust isn't going to net you crap, full system or not. Post numbers if you've got them.
I threw chips on there because there are 900 on ebay that advertise all sorts of crap. I just don't want this guy wasting his money.

And I didn't mention obvious suspension mods on the list because as I understood it, he was asking about engine performance.

 

It's called a FULL exhaust system, not some silly cat-back. An engine straight out of the header N/A is actually going to make you lose power because an N/A car needs back pressure. Post numbers? Dude, I make 330whp on low boost (350ish whp if you are talking Dynojet). I was N/A about 8yrs ago. And there is no "chip" for a tC. That's gimmick stuff to take your money. If you didn't want him wasting his money, you wouldn't have even mentioned a "chip" in the first place. He said performance, to me that's more than just engine. OP should think more on a broader scale. Power means nothing if you don't have the supporting mods to utilize it effectively.

You must not know of me huh? I reckon I don't come here that often, but I'm one of the OG's with a tC. Boosted and racing one since 2005.

 

If all I did was talk down to people on all the Scion sites, then I would be banned from them. Which I'm clearly not.

To the OP, being N/A does not have to suck. Depends on what you do with it.

Little N/A action
http://youtu.be/sq0Ul9S8cOg

http://youtu.be/C4M1n68wELo

 

I think we can all agree that there isn't anything you can do to a N/A tC to increase its ENGINE performance by any noticeable gain. We can also agree that with boost, these cars can do a lot more.

And thirdly, we can agree that the tC does best performance-wise on a track or autoX course with LOTS of turns, because suspension work is something this car does well. It's not a quarter miler unless it's forced induction.

Tldr; if the Op wants to increase performance, work on suspension. Boosting the car is your only real option for the engine. The tC isn't a fast car.

 

I reckon it all depends on what you consider "noticeable". Stock 2005-06 tC will dyno around 140whp. After I/H/E and possibly a pulley, I've seen them dyno 170whp. I'd say that's decently noticeable both on the Butt dyno and the actual dyno. Cracking open the engine for N/A builds is a waste of time personally speaking, because you are going to spend the same amount of money for F/I but only just break over 200whp and with F/I you would break over 500whp with the right turbo setup.

An intake by itself, not noticeable. An exhaust by itself can be noticed in the mid-range. A header by itself, I doubt you will notice, don't know I never had just a header. All 3 together is definitely noticeable. But if you plan to go F/I in the future, then Intake and Header are two items you will just eventually sell anyway, so I didn't even bother purchasing them.

 

I reckon it all depends on what you consider "noticeable". Stock 2005-06 tC will dyno around 140whp. After I/H/E and possibly a pulley, I've seen them dyno 170whp. .

05-06 dynos at 125 according to all the numbers provided by Ptuning (Cant find the thread!). With I/H/E they can dyno at 140 maybe 150 if it's a high reading dyno...

One of the folks at club tC had I/E/H/Cams + pro tune and made 170. He said he was still having trouble against the civic si.

Do you have any dyno graphs of the 170hp tC?

A I/H/E tC is the same amount of acceleration and performance as a tC with the TRD supercharger on it. Talking about manual transmission that is. In fact I would put my money on the N/A tC to win. Seen that race plenty of times to know the outcome. .

I thought the S/C tC made 200HP?

A Supercharged tC with I/H/E added to it, is as quick or slightly quicker than a full bolt on 2006 Civic SI.

This i can believe... a full bolt-on 2006 si makes 170tq / 240HP so I dont see why they would'nt be well matched.

 

im going to pretty much stay out of this lil argument here but i have cat back CAI pulleys and can tell the difference when i drove a stock tc at my local dealership. im not saying its hella faster, but there is a better throttle response.

i can feel the difference but im not saying its making it alot faster.

id say if you raced a stock tc vs a decently set up NA tc. the NA will pull a little on a stock one. but your not going to stomp it


also you forgot to add a light weight fly wheel to the list

 

Lol. This thread has evolved nicely.

 

Well, I/H/E might get you some noticeable performance.. But what's the cost to the wallet? Too much IMO (and that's why I didn't even bother once I saw the prices), you might net some torque here and few ponies there, but without Turbo set up, the net changes don't offset the costs. (usually)

 

A I/H/E tC is the same amount of acceleration and performance as a tC with the TRD supercharger on it. Talking about manual transmission that is. In fact I would put my money on the N/A tC to win. Seen that race plenty of times to know the outcome. You would need to and a I/H/E back to the supercharged tC to seeing the tables back definitively. A Supercharged tC with I/H/E added to it, is as quick or slightly quicker than a full bolt on 2006 Civic SI.

 

I think what Candle just confuses the lack of gains VS gain per dollar ratio.
gains will be there. But to get them, one has to use quality parts, which comes in with not cost effective in comparison to FI set up

 

Probably right there. I just hate seeing people waste money on things they think make them go fast.

 

This.

It's easy to say that I/H/E doesn't net you any gains, because for a majority of the people coming on here, looking for power gains, they're expecting to drop $500 and gain 50hp+. In comparison to that, what they'll actually get is basically nothing.

 

It's a no brainer that F/I is the way to go on this car. But that is not to say there are no gains with I/H/E setups. It will put the car reliably in the 14sec range, down from the usual mid-low 15sec range that they run stock. Just depends on what the owners goals are.

 

Think about your average entry level tC owner...

Typcially between the ages of 16-24.

What do most people in that age bracket want from their first car, or their first little "sporty" car that their parents didn't give them?

I'll answer it for you -- they want it to go fast. We live in a time now where apparantly your pride is measured on how fast your car can go. And let's be honest, although AutoX is big in most of our hearts here, it's not as popular as your run-of-the-mill everyday "drag race". I obviously use that term lightly, considering most of these kids consider going from 0-75 in between traffic lights to be "drag racing".

So, with all the considerations, I'd have to assume -- with probably an 85% accuracy rate, that the people coming here asking for "performance mods" are inquiring as to what will give them best results in the tasks above.

Just my .02

 

^That's because they don't know any better and don't know what "real" racing is.

 

I can easily agree with that.

 

I'm pretty sure this dude isn't asking for performance mods so he can go out and race his tC. If he was he probably would have mentioned that. He's looking for some non-too-pricey add-ons for the tC that will increase his horsepower a bit.

In my opinion, the priceower gain you get from them is not worth the $$$.
______________

This thread got out of hand. Dude hasn't even been back in 5 days.

 

blah blah blah blah...

suspension.

 

blah blah blah blah...

Suspension.

this ^^

 

Anyone here?

 

A wideband 02 sensor is good too. It will help your AFR and throttle response. It wont give you horsepower though, just like a pedal commander.

 

That's not true. Full exhaust you will notice a gain. I particularly noticed gains in the mid-range after a full exhaust on the tC.

 

Yes it is. I'm not going to argue with you, but I said it will NOT give you horsepower, But, it will help your AFR and give you better throttle response. If you don't believe me, look it up.

 

Won't net you any noticeable horsepower. COMIBINED you're looking at like 7-10 (and a very loud, hideous-sounding car). And that's not anything that you're going to notice or that is going to matter.

 

I know this is an old thread, but I noticed nobody mentioned lightweight rims and I know they make a difference in overall performance {braking, acceleration and cornering}.