Scion tC Forums banner
261 - 277 of 277 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
227 Posts
Originally posted by metalranger33@Oct 21 2006, 05:08 AM
i went to the track 2 weeks after i got the pulley and i went from a 15.7 to a 15.4 ... i went back to back 2 weeks in a row....a month or 2 later i went to the track and couldnt hit better than a 15.8 and i went back to back 2 weeks in a row...(its my crazy track cycle just to make sure the mod is working)anyways long story short i got rid of the pulley and my car feels so much better i felt like i lost power for a good while....when they took off the pulley there was oil in the timing area but the pulley was fine, and the guy who owns the shop told me it was loose and it was a matter of time that my car would have gone bad
this is track proven...where are u slips
 

· Registered
Joined
·
703 Posts
wow what a long thread that was brought back alive....so a pulley is not a good mod for your car?
 

· Ironhead
Joined
·
12,859 Posts
Originally posted by jspek@Nov 25 2006, 04:26 AM
wow i want my 10 minutes back after reading this cluster #### called a thread lol. i think i forgot what this was about. well anyway, good morning.
yeah, that is why there is a sticky with the pertinent information right at the top of this forum. this thread is mostly useless at this point. reminds me of every single SL thread. i should lock it, huh?
 

· Ironhead
Joined
·
12,859 Posts
yes, the same thing applies. it is not mfg specific. replacing a dampened pulley with a solid pulley has been known to lead to disaster.
 

· BOOST its what I do!
Joined
·
6,530 Posts
Originally posted by inevitablegod@Nov 25 2006, 09:05 AM
yes, the same thing applies. it is not mfg specific. replacing a dampened pulley with a solid pulley has been known to lead to disaster.
Proven by Science it self.
 

· Destroyer of Cones
Joined
·
7,513 Posts
No, but it is a great point to take in.

ATI, a good builder of performance parts, felt that the answer to whether a dampened pulley was needed was not only yes, but that a better damper is needed as you up the power. They will not build a non-dampened pulley.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
35 Posts
Wow....i read this whole thing and i am very depressed (but thankful).....i just got the NST pulley and belt and was looking forward to put it on....now looks like its a no go....i guess a flywheel is the way to go....thanks for all the info!!!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,861 Posts
2-3-4 hours later..I lost count because I was so into the thread and I don't remember what time I started reading.

all I have to say is WOW.

It's funny how it turned out:

Pulley good?

-no.

Pulley good, look dyno!

-No, look: links, experience, names, numbers, accounts, proof,
science!

Pulley good, look more dyno, + scion life members say good! No problem yet?

-No, you'll regret it.--more science, real life examples, dumbed down explanations w/ pictures.

Pulley great! DYNO! Track time! .0001?

-No.

Pulley Good! Personal attacks non relevant to thread, attacks on character.

-Ignorance. On topic please, you have on proof, you are flawed, you are ignorant.

Pulley bad! car boom :[

-Told you.

But...I was told pulley good from 20 year old mechanic with no green card.

-Haha, Pulley bad, sticky now.

I have poof pulley good!

-No you don't.

...no response

...no response

-He's gone, He ran.

pulley good?

-NO!

I can go on forever, into more detail, with pictures and links. But That's my summary.

This thread took my night, but it was very entertaining and informative. I would like to allocate those who had the patience to put up with the ignorance and constant questions after explaining it numerous times in numerous threads/posts etc.. Do all yourselves a favor and just say, "I told you so."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
I'm going to be flat out honest, all though it took me like 3 hours to throughly read this forum, look a muliple different websites, look at a lot of bashing, listen to knowledgable people spill their heart out, so to speak, on the subject, I'm grateful they did. There is so much evidence, proof, science, etc. that they have provided to back up the fact that solid crank pulleys are a bad mod. I'm a rook and accept that, but even I see the points that all of these guys are making, and the fact that one actually tested it on track and got results to prove it didn't perform as advertised. Thanks a lot for all the great info guys.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
no wait. wait. all we have is theories and opposing views of what is better. we have no factual proof that a L.W. pulley actually caused an engine (scion engine to be exact) to implode. whereas, we have analytical data from Dinan and the rest of the pro's that these pullies are bad for your car.


***UPDATED INFORMATION:

I recently had a chance to sit down with one of the engineers for the scion tc and he was telling me all the variables that were tested like you wouldn't even imagine.
10,000 miles? take that outside for a walk. 100,000 miles? take a sip of your lemonade.

so, it all came down to just like how zpi claimed 21 WHP with their head package and no one had dyno's to prove it (not even zpi), i had to question the undeniable itch of uncertainty about lightweight pulleys. when i had asked him whether if these pulleys will make the engine explode, he smiled back and said, 'if i were to tell you, i'd have to kill you.' then he proceeded to explain that it was too complicated for me to understand, that it goes beyond the realms of physics. it's more about the politics of it all. he said.

he said that, if they were to produce a car that could do 50 mpg that could do zip to 60 in 4 seconds, and still cost $16 grand, nobody would be in business because 1) everybody would buy this car and 2) everybody would kill each other from sheer insanity. so, we build cars that are moderately in the 'safe-zone' in the economic sense, with the basis that people are going to work for what they want. so, when we built the Scion TC, the protype was designed to have 330 HP, AWD, bi-turbo hybrid system we had implemented not too long ago, achieving nothing that we've never seen before. The drivetrain loss were almost minimal, down to 3%, due to a system using two light crank pulleys that were infused with each other to compensate for the harmonic imbalance. the results were astounding. because we had put two pullies instead of one, it doubled the power output from 330 HP from the crank to almost 600 HP. It was unbelievable how simple math could really add up like this. We then put Type R stickers, along with the JDM shift knobs, and it added another 45 HP to the WHEELZZZZZ~

so, if you're going to do the pulley mod, do it right. put two in and gun it like there's no tomorrow.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
113 Posts
QUOTE (lo bux racer @ Oct 9 2005, 05:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=98832
Originally posted by NavyDoc05@Oct 9 2005, 08:46 AM
eddnog, yea man i noticed a difference. especially in throttle response, or at least it feels. LO BUX RACER, where did you get your information? do you have a website address from a credible author?if so send me the link please. and yes my oil pump still works, and if im supposed to feel vibration, i havent felt it at all.

i just got off the phone with my personal mechanic, ESC racing, www.escracing.com, and he says he has never heard of a lightweight pulley causing any problems of that sort, and even if it did, why would Unorthodox Racing make a faulty pulley? that opens them up to all sorts of lawsuits. my mechanic is going to call unorthodox racing on monday to see what they say, and im sure it will be the same as his.. overall, im still happy with my buy. fidanza flywheel? why would i do that? if im going to do that im going to get a new clutch as well. sorry, my car is still fairly new.
Start here. Then click here. Then click here for information directly from Toyota, the guys who designed your car and engine.

Shawn Baumgartner (owner of Unorthodox Racing) will NEVER tell you there is any danger to his product. I have argued with him in the past about this, he is an idiot. He also will not pay for your engine repairs, he only warrants his crank pulley for manufacturing defects. He does NOT warrant any incidental or consequential damages, and has not paid any claims for damage attributed to his product because his warranty is very specific.

Ask Guillermo Polo, Michael Gaari, Lance at Toyomoto in Miami, and a host of other Supra owners what happens when you remove your harmonic damper and replace it with a UR pulley. Flexplate bolts back out. Crank position wheels break and rotate so the engine either won't start at all, or will fail intermittently while driving. Rod and main bearings show unusual wear patterns. And a host of other wonderful things.

I realize you don't understand the physics. Here's what I can tell you for sure: your oil pump is chain driven. Chains do not like shock loads. Removing the damper increases the shock loading on both the oil pump chain and the cam chain. One (or both) will break prematurely. If they were belt driven, it would be no issue, but they are not belt driven, so they will likely be the first casualties from removing the damper.

The flywheel change has NO negative effects. Zip. Zero. Nada. Nil. It will not void your warranty, but I guarantee you, the UR pulley will because Toyota will show up in court with the same documentation I've linked here and you'll be screwed. It is a BAD mod, and should not be recommended by any reputable engine builder. NO domestic engine builder would ever recommend removing a torsional damper and replacing it with a solid pulley. They know all too well what will happen to a cast crank without a damper: it will break, without any doubt. This is why Fluidamper, ATI, and TCI have a booming business with domestic engines. It is not only bad physics, but it is also bad business to replace a damper with a solid pulley.
[/b]
'ok so i know i run the risk of sounding like a complete fool but...is there any way to get a more durable oil pump and cam chain and also is there any way to convert over to belt driven?
 
261 - 277 of 277 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top