Panoramic Glass Roof - Scion tC Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 12:51 AM Thread Starter
Obsessed
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TCrazy
Default

Ok guys, with all the squeek/rattle trouble this roof has given Scion engineer's do you think its really worth it? I mean seriously, the roof is NO WHERE near panoramic. On the outside, yea its all glass........big whoop cause you can only see out of an extra 8x11 area in the back!!!!!!!!!!

Would you rather have a rock-solid tC with a normal sunroof (ditch that little back non-functional roof) or have the "pseudo-panoramic" roof with all of its troubles?
Those of you who dont have roof rattles can still answer, does that 2nd sunroof justify the extra cost/structural support/weight/lower gas mileage???? Disucss....... - t


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TCrazy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 01:39 AM
Pick your own - you deserve it.
 
Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,507
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I think it really adds to the car & 1700+ miles I may have had one pop
*knocks on wood*

Also visit
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Check out the all new
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Eric is offline  
post #3 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:05 AM
Pick your own - you deserve it.
 
imasaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: la la land
Posts: 1,838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Hell yes its worth it... Although it maybe heavier than the normal metal roof... although it screaks/rattles/pops... although it gets lots of water spots... although I gotta hear everyone complain about it, this is including myself... although the mechanical parts will probably get worn down in a few years and will cost us a few hundred bucks to replace... although it may leak one day... I still love it!!

The glass roof is an integral part of the tC. Without it, its just another wannabe sports coupe... like the hyndai tiberon . Its what differentiate us from other wannabe sports coupe owners.

Eventhough most of us will leave the moon roof cover closed to protect the interior from sun damage... and those of us who do leave it open, probably don't even have passengers in the back to enjoy it... I say Hell Yah... its still worth it.

Honestly... if tC owners wanted a sports coupe... we should go buy a real sports coupe. I think the tC offers just the right balance of style, grace, power, utility and value. I wouldn't trade the glass roof for an extra 5-10 HP... or whatever it is we would supposedly gain from the reduction in weight. I could open up my left fog light cover to get that for free... why else do you think Scion made the fog lights go in the middle grill instead of the the side pockets where the fog lights are supposed to go?

On another note, do you really think Scion will lower the price of the car next year if it comes out with a tC without the glass roof? I don't think so. Its all a marketing ploy to reduce their production & maintenance (warranty) costs to get a better bottom line.

Of course... this is just my take on this... what do I know about cars... about business... I'm just a girl...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
imasaf is offline  
 
post #4 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:22 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I totally think the scion engineers should have just stuck with a normal sunroof / moonroof rather than the "panoramic moonroof." I think that the opening for the front moonroof is too small, and the one in the back isn't even that big and doesn't open. Plus the passengers in the back can barely see out of the back moonroof anyways. The idea for the panoramic moonroof is novel for a sports coupe, but the cons of it plus the poor execution outweighs the benefits of the panoramic moonroof. If they some how designed it to be bigger (truly panoramic), and no rattles, then I think the benefits of the panoramic roof would outweigh the cons.

Pros with no panoramic moonroof:

1. LIGHTER!!! (panoramic moonroofs usually add 150-200lbs) which means faster, better handling, better braking, and better gas mileage. (a better sports car overall)

2. Stiffer Chassis with out all glass roof (less body flex and safer crash/roller over)

3. Cheaper: yes the tc is cheap, but it could have been even cheaper without the extra design/materials/engineer costs to the panoramic roof.

4. No cheap moonroof cover, could have used a solid sliding cover.

5. No squeaks, rattles, or wind noise do to panoramic roof.

6. More head room for all passengers.

7. (maybe) Could have made a single roof slide back into the roof, instead of up and out.

8. Not sure, but I think that the glass roof makes it like sauna in the the car on hot days, like a greenhouse. Regular moonroof might be cooler on hot days

9. Better looking roof from the exterior, with body color on roof

10. Bigger moonroof for front passengers (the ones who count )

The reasons I mentioned above, the degree of the benefit might be minimal or substantial, but nevertheless, there would be the above improvements.

Yep, so due to all those reasons...I think for 2006 they should offer a standard roof, or a regular moonroof.

Just my 2 cents...more like 3 cents. But either way, I still think the tc rocks!!!
edng16 is offline  
post #5 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:29 AM Thread Starter
Obsessed
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TCrazy
Default

edng, you put into words what I thought in my head as I wrote my original post. I agree with everything you wrote, and I believe that the tC could have gone from great to excellent with the benefits proidedby a normal roof........ - t


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TCrazy is offline  
post #6 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:40 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

imasaf wrote:

"The glass roof is an integral part of the tC. Without it, its just another wannabe sports coupe... like the hyndai tiberon . Its what differentiate us from other wannabe sports coupe owners. "

Very true, I totally agree. It does make the tc very unique. I just wish the engineers pulled it off better. But who knows, maybe if they do make a regular roof in the future, maybe the benefits I mentioned in the post above would be very minimal. Meaning the engineers actually did a really good job! who knows

imasaf also wrote:

"On another note, do you really think Scion will lower the price of the car next year if it comes out with a tC without the glass roof?"

I'm not sure...they might not because it would take more design/ engineering to change the the existing chassis. But I'm pretty sure material/manufacturing wise, it should be cheaper. My overall guess would be that it should be cheaper. But because of this, I'm guessing that in the future they won't make a fixed roof due to the fact that they will have to sell tc for less, plus it will cost more for them to design a regular roof. The only reason I think they would make a regular roof is if the panoramic roof has enough problems to slow/ deter sales (which doesn't seem to be the case now) or making a normal roof is cheaper for them.

But if from the very beginning the made a normal roof, meaning the 2005 tc, it definately would have been cheaper. But what's already done is done.
edng16 is offline  
post #7 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:40 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by imasaf@Sep 13 2004, 10:05 PM
Hell yes its worth it...

...
Agree with every word! err.. except for the fact that I'm not a girl

Seriously though, the moonroof is a differentiator. I think it makes it stand out from all the other cars.

I have to add that I've yet to hear any noise from my moonroof. I suppose I might feel differently otherwise.

Also I mainly commute in this car, so if I can get to/from work comfortably, reliably, and in a little bit of style, so much the better.
bender2929 is offline  
post #8 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 02:54 AM
Pick your own - you deserve it.
 
imasaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: la la land
Posts: 1,838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Ok... let me ask you guys/gals... did the panoramic sun/moon roof combination not excite you at all when you first saw the car?? Did it not make you feel like the car had that extra umph?? Does it not bring you joy or pride when you show it off to your family or friends?? Does it not make you feel different and unique as an individual driving around in this car??

Just remember... sometimes the intangible things are not accounted for or gets less recognition because they are not easily measurable... not because they aren't important. How you feel about the car or what it represents for you... is very important. If its not... why would companies work so hard to develop an image for their brand??

If Scion plans on getting rid of the panoramic roof next year... they should just put the car back into the Toyota line and call it the 06 Celica!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
imasaf is offline  
post #9 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 03:00 AM
Pick your own - you deserve it.
 
imasaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: la la land
Posts: 1,838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by edng16@Sep 13 2004, 11:40 PM
But if from the very beginning the made a normal roof, meaning the 2005 tc, it definately would have been cheaper.
Yes... and they would have had to call it the 05 Celica...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
imasaf is offline  
post #10 of 41 (permalink) Old 09-14-2004, 07:44 AM
Pick your own - you deserve it.
 
basilisk4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,586
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to basilisk4
Default

I think the 05 tC looks great with the panoramic moonroof. I do not believe that the 05 would've been cheaper to buy (cheaper to produce, yes, but I don't think they were going to lower the sticker any more than it already is) even without the panoramic moonroof. I also don't believe that the sunroof/moonroof in the front would've been bigger otherwise -- people who ride in my car are constantly telling me how huge the front moonroof is, and I haven't seen a bigger one in a car of similar size.

If speed had been my only concern, I would've bought a 350Z...

Marty (basilisk4) - 2007 Acura TL Type-S
Legacy: 2005 Scion tC (Flint Mica/Auto) (08/2004-04/2008)
basilisk4 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome